One has only to look at the manifesto signed by 20 Palestinian politicians and academiciansagainst the “tyranny and corruption” of Yassir Arafat, in order understand what happened tothe Palestinian people during the last hundred years,
At the beginning of the 20th century, all Palestine belonged to the Arabs (even if politicalcontrol was in the hands of the Ottoman Turks). At the end of the 20 th century, there is noPalestine on the map, half of the Palestinian people are refugees and Israel is in fullpossession of all the country between the Jordan river and the sea.
How could it happen that a whole people lost its country – and almost its very existence – as aresult of the immigration of a few thousand Zionists at the beginning of the century?
(In his illuminating book, “Palestinian Identity”, Rashid Khalidi proves that right fromthe beginning some Palestinian leaders and intellectuals recognized the full meaning ofthis immigration for the Palestinian people.)
Many reasons can be cited: the efficiency of the Zionist movement and the Hebrew community itcreated in Palestine, the treason of the Arab states, imperialist intrigues etc. But the bulkof the blame must be put squarely on the shoulders of the Palestinian people itself: its lack ofcohesion at critical moments, its inability to unite around a strong leadership, thepoisonous hatred and jealousy between its component organizations, parties and families.
The media called this document “a manifesto against the corruption”, but is very far frombeing so. Its centerpiece is the monstrous allegation that in Oslo, Arafat and his colleagueshave sold the Palestinian homeland to the Israelis in return for their personal enrichment.This is an attack on the Oslo agreement and the PLO policy of seeking peace based on a compromisewith Israel.
In Israel, the manifesto has caused much Joy. Everyone understands that such an attack,commanding wold-wide media attention, is weakening the position of the Palestinianleadership just as the Barak government is preparing the annexation to Israel of wide tractsof the West Bank and proposes to turn the rest into a kind of Palestinian Bantustan underIsraeli control. It destroys the support of international public opinion for thePalestinian cause.
But the initiators of the manifesto are not Israeli agents – even of no Israeli agent could haveserved it better. The initiative is Syrian. Syria was always opposed to the creation of areally independent State of Palestine, and at this point it tries strenuously to prevent anIsraeli-Palestinian peace agreement. Some of the signatories are well known as long-timesupporters of the Syrian Ba’ath party, most of the others are members of “refusal front”organizations located in Damascus. All of them are opponents of the Oslo agreement.
The corruption theme appears in the manifesto only as a pretext. Of course, there is a lot ofcorruption in the Palestinian territories, and every Palestinian knows it. But it is notworse than in any other Arab country. In Germany, ex-chancellor Helmut Kohl is being accusedof receiving immense bribes from abroad and distributing the money among his cronies. TheIsraeli government, which is paying great sums of money to the functionaries of the religiousparties, in return for their support of the coalition, has no reason to hold its nose high.
Arafat’s secret bank accounts and his objection to “transparency” are caused, at leastpartially, by the need to finance actions connected to the present phase of the Palestinianstruggle: the upkeep of the Palestinian embassies around the world (forbidden to the PA by theOslo agreements), preparations for a possible violent confrontation with Israel (yes,still possible!) and protection of the Palestinian refugee camps in Arab countries.
One can understand the fury of Arafat and his colleagues when Palestinian personalities aretrying to undermine their position at such a critical moment of the fight. (In a similarpre-state situation, Ben Gurion delivered the underground Irgun fighters to the tendermercies of the British police). However, the arrest of some of the signatories is a seriousmistake, by itself and also because it seems to reinforce the allegations about the despotismof the Palestinian authority.
It is the duty of a decent person to fight against corruption and for a democratic regime inevery state, especially in a new state. Such a fight was waged in the first years of the State ofIsrael, when Finance Minister Levy Eshkol openly justified corruption by quoting thebiblical injunction “Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn.” But the Stateof Palestine does not exist yet. At this moment, the Palestinian people is going through afateful – perhaps the most fateful – stage of its struggle for national survival. If it issuccessful, a free Palestinian state will come into being, and its citizens will be able tomake sure that it will be a democratic state, free from corruption. If the Palestinianstruggle fails, the Palestinians will become a people of slaves under Israeli domination.
If even at such an hour the Palestinians are not able to unite behind their leadership – and eventhe greatest foes of Arafat do not put forward anyone else to lead this fight – they will add yetanother chapter to the tale of their misfortunes.