Sometimes a single sentence is enough to reveal a person’s mental world and intellectualprofundity. Such a sentence was uttered by Shaul Mofaz, the Minister of Defense, some days agoduring a visit to the Israeli troops in the Gaza Strip.
“With our enemies, it seems, no shortcuts are possible. Egypt made peace with Israel onlyafter it was defeated in the Yom Kippur War. That will happen with the Palestinians, too.”
This means that there is no political solution. There is only war, and in this war we must”defeat” the Palestinians. A simple, simplistic, not to say primitive, view.
But the revealing sentence is: “Egypt made peace with Israel only after it was defeated in theYom Kippur War”.
Revealing, because it utterly contradicts the almost unanimous view of all the experts inIsrael and around the world – historians, Arabists and military commentators. These believethat the exact opposite is true: Anwar Sadat was able to lead Egypt towards peace only becausehe was admired as the commander who had defeated Israel in the Yom Kippur War. Only after theEgyptian people had won back their national pride were they able to consider peace with theenemy (with us).
When the war broke out, the Egyptians did something that amazed the world and shook Israel:they crossed the Suez Canal and overcame the celebrated “Bar-Lev line”. Everybodyconsidered this a brilliant military feat. The stupidity of Israeli army intelligence andthe arrogant complacency of Prime Minister Golda Meir allowed the Egyptians to achieve totalsurprise, destroy a large number of tanks and pin down the Israeli Air force. The Minister ofDefense, Moshe Dayan, was in shock and talked about the “destruction of the third Jewishstate”. (In traditional Jewish historiography, the first two Jewish states are symbolizedby the first and second temple in Jerusalem.)
In the course of the war, the tide turned and, in the end, the Israeli army crossed the Canal intoEgypt. At the end of the war, Israeli troops were established on the western shore, but largeEgyptian forces remained to their rear, on the eastern side. This week a long-delayedofficial study by the Israeli army was leaked. It declares unequivocally that Israel had “notwon that war”.
But the professional military analysis is not so important in this context. What is importantis how the events appear to the Egyptian consciousness and affect their actions since then.
I succeeded in reaching Cairo on the morrow of Sadat’s sensational visit to Jerusalem, andfound myself in a city drunk with joy, in some kind of delirious popular carnival. Over the mainstreets stretched hundreds of slogans celebrating the act of the president. Everycommercial corporation felt duty-bound to hang such a slogan with a peace message.
The one slogan that outnumbered all others was “Anwar Sadat: Hero of War and Peace”.
The Egyptian people would not have supported peace, if they had considered it a surrender tothe diktat of an arrogant enemy. Only the crossing of the Canal four years earlier, whichEgyptians consider one of the greatest victories in all the 8000 years of their history,enabled them to accept the agreement as a compromise between equals, without loss of honor.Like many other nations, the Egyptians – and all other Arabs – consider national dignity themost important treasure.
Perhaps Mofaz should go to Cairo and visit the round building that houses the museum of theRamadan War (as Arabs call the Yom Kippur War). There he will see an exciting, emotion-ladendisplay of the crossing of the Canal. Every day the place is thronged with people, especiallyschool-children.
If one wants to draw a parallel between the Egyptians and the Palestinians, as Mofaz tries todo, the conclusion would be: only after the Palestinians win back their nationalself-respect, will they be able to make peace with Israel. The first intifada , whichPalestinians consider a victorious struggle against the immense might of the Israeli army,allowed them to accept the Oslo agreement. Only the second intifada , which has already provedthat the Israeli army cannot subdue the Palestinian uprising, enabled them to accept the RoadMap, which is supposed to bring about peace between the Israeli and the coming Palestinianstate.
On a related topic: On the eve of the thirtieth anniversary of the Yom Kippur War, Israelinewspapers are full of revelations about it. Among them is the disclosure that I saved the lifeof Moshe Dayan. That surprised me, as it would have surprised Dayan, if he were still living.But it appears to be true.
The facts are revealed by Amir Porat, the former communication officer and personalconfidant of Shmuel Gonen (universally known as “Gorodish”), who was in charge of SouthernCommand during the war. Later, when the public was looking for a scapegoat for the terribleinitial defeat, the main blame was put on Gorodish. He was dismissed from his command andnobody was prepared to listen to his side of the story. All the media boycotted him.
This man, who practically overnight had fallen from the height of glory (as one of the heroes ofthe 1967 Six Day War) to the depths of ignominy, was in despair. He blamed Dayan for theinjustice done to him. In the end he made an appointment with him, planning to shoot him and thenhimself.
At the very last moment, one day before the fateful meeting, Haolam Hazeh correspondent RinoTzror arranged a meeting between us. At the time I was editor-in-chief this newsmagazine, theonly medium in the country that was truly independent of the establishment. We had areputation for supporting the underdog and challenging the powers that be. I talked with himat length. During the whole conversation he toyed with his pistol.
Gorodish was very far from my political views, he was a right-wing person, an out-and-outmilitarist, but I became convinced that the official inquiry into the war had indeed done him ashocking injustice. Therefore I promised to help him getting his side of the story across. Hesaw that the whole world was not closed to him. Having someone listening to his side of the storyand promising to publish it relieved his despair and made him give up the idea of killing Dayanand committing suicide. I published a large article under the headline “The IsraeliDreyfus”.
This affair has its ironic side. In the whole of Israel, no one was more opposed to Dayan than I.More than anyone else (except Ben-Gurion and his sidekick, Shimon Peres) Dayan laid down inthe 1950s the anti-Arab tracks on which Israel is moving to this very day. In the pages of HaolamHazeh I attacked him relentlessly, writing hundreds of articles against him, exposing hisillegal traffic in stolen archeological finds and his private peccadilloes that endangeredthe security of the state. And in the end it appears that I saved his life.
Back to the main point: The Yom Kippur War did not lead to the “destruction of the third state”,as Dayan had prophesied, but to peace with Egypt, after its national honor had been restored.If Sharon and the army command succeed in disrupting the hudna (truce) and bring about therenewal of the intifada , they will not break the Palestinians, who will refuse to submit. Andafter large-scale bloodshed, Yasser Arafat will make a speech in the Knesset, as did Sadat,the “Hero of War and Peace”.